« Why HTTP uris are better than urns and even id: uris for identifiers | Main | Definition of an Engineer »

My review of the XML Binary Characterizations Working Group

now available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Apr/0059.html. Interesting and useful work in the WG, but there's a ways to go before deciding to pick one binary format for the W3C. This takes into account knowledge that bea, msft, ibm, expway, agiledelta, adobe, oracle, etc. have binary formats in production.

Posted on April 11, 2005 2:47 PM |

Post a comment

(If you haven't left a comment here before, you may need to be approved by the site owner before your comment will appear. Until then, it won't appear on the entry. Thanks for waiting.)

Search


About

This page contains a single entry from the blog posted on April 11, 2005 2:47 PM.

The previous post in this blog was Why HTTP uris are better than urns and even id: uris for identifiers.

The next post in this blog is Definition of an Engineer.

Many more can be found on the main index page or by looking through the archives.

Subscribe to this blog's feed
[What is this?]
Powered by
Movable Type 3.34