My review of the XML Binary Characterizations Working Group

| | Comments (0)

now available at http://lists.w3.org/Archives/Public/www-tag/2005Apr/0059.html. Interesting and useful work in the WG, but there's a ways to go before deciding to pick one binary format for the W3C. This takes into account knowledge that bea, msft, ibm, expway, agiledelta, adobe, oracle, etc. have binary formats in production.

Leave a comment

About this Entry

This page contains a single entry by Dave Orchard published on April 11, 2005 2:47 PM.

Why HTTP uris are better than urns and even id: uris for identifiers was the previous entry in this blog.

Definition of an Engineer is the next entry in this blog.

Find recent content on the main index or look in the archives to find all content.

Categories